| Now you can vote for us on Netscape too! Just click the "Vote Up" arrow... | |
| Help Us To Spread The Word. Just click the "Digg It" button and, well, DIGG IT! |
![]() |
|
| | home | sign up | news tips | permalink | |
A thoroughly unauthenticated audio tape, allegedly from the putative "terror group" called "al-Q'aida in Iraq", was released earlier today and has been the subject of some extremely uncritical "reporting", especially in American "news" media. Meanwhile, in Britain, the "news" reports are trumpeting a "major" speech from the supposedly "anti-terror" wing of their secret government. Looks like another big terror-alert weekend looming. In light of some recent news (Democrats take control of both houses of Congress, Dumsfeld set to resign and may face charges for war crimes, and so on), it makes sense to say, once again, "How Incredibly Convenient!!" From the UPI wire service: Al-Qaida message hails U.S. elections A statement reportedly from the new leader of al-Qaida in Iraq saluted Republican defeats in Tuesday's U.S. elections.Ireland Online has an even wider variety of lurid ludicrous details: Al-Qaida: We'll blow up the White House Al Qaida’s leader in Iraq today vowed his fighters will never rest until they have blown up the White House and reached Jerusalem.It's hard to imagine where he got that idea! Blowing up the filthiest house? From under the olive trees of Rumieh? Yeah, sure! Of all the media reports I have seen so far, only the BBC has mentioned that the tape is unauthenticated. 'Iraq al-Qaeda' welcomes US poll A statement purportedly from the leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq hails the defeat of Republicans in the US mid-term polls.
Well, we should be scared, because we know who is behind all this, and we also know that they are ruthless and wicked, fabulously wealthy, and embedded deep within our own government. Oops! Did I really say that? Well, what do you know? Bring me the alleged Islamist website that hosts this audio tape! Where is it hosted this time? London? Houston? Maryland? And why does it always turn out this way? Every major "terrorist" attack in recent memory has been perpetrated by "terror cells" heavily infested with agents of CIA and/or FBI and/or MI5 and/or MI6. Every major terror alert has turned out to be phony, overblown, premature or all of the above. And now in Britain, the fear-mongering is moving up a couple of notches. From the Independent: MI5 head warns of up to 30 terror plots at work in Britain There are up to 30 alleged "mass casualty" terror plots in operation in Britain, as well as hundreds of young British Muslims on a path to radicalisation, the head of MI5 has said.And what is the reason for this unprecendented announcement? Are Britons finally starting to realize that the terror alerts that nearly shut down their airports in August were politically timed and seriously overblown? Or are they just getting a bit jaded? For those who are jaded, she adds: Islamic militants linked to al -Qa'ida were recruiting teenagers to carry out attacks using chemicals, bacteriological agents, radioactive materials and even nuclear technology.And for those who are starting to figure all this out, here's an expecially juicy morsel: Dame Manningham-Buller said she was not seeking to be alarmist, and did not wish to stir up fear.Oh no! Who would ever suspect that she wished to stir up fear? But not to worry! Here comes Tony Blair to the rescue with a statement that, on the face of it, seems to condemn his "anti-terror" program for incompetence. As reported by the New York Times: Blair Says Terrorist Threat to Last ‘a Generation’ Prime Minister Tony Blair said today that the threat from home-grown Islamic terrorism would last “a generation,” reinforcing a highly unusual warning by the head of the MI5 domestic intelligence agency that some 1,600 suspects in 200 terrorist conspiracies were under surveillance.And so on. I can never resist the urge to yawn when I listen to this particular chronically lying sack of fertilizer. The NYT article takes some pains to reproduce the grand recurring canard of British/American anti-terror spin, which in this instance comes out as: Mrs. Manningham-Buller echoed arguments made by Mr. Blair, who has resisted critics’ accusations that his support of the United States in Iraq and Afghanistan had made Britain a target for terrorist attack. “Let there be no doubt about this,” she said, “the international terrorist threat to this country is not new. It began before Iraq, before Afghanistan and before 9/11.”As I have pointed out numerous times, apparently without making a dent in the official line, none of this is relevant to anything the critics of the Iraq war have been saying. We are saying the war makes terrorism worse. We never said there was no terrorism before the war started, or before the war in Afghanistan started, or before the obviously false-flagged attacks of 9/11. But I digress. The NYT does come close to answering a question I posed earlier, however: Historically, the head of MI5 does not make such public pronouncements. Mrs. Manningham-Buller acknowledged in a speech to academics Thursday night: “I rarely speak in public. I prefer to avoid the limelight and get on with my job.”The campaign to secure more funding is surely only a part of the motivation, is it not? Looking at it from another angle, the Times of India plays a politically correct game (given its position) by highlighting the revelation of Pakistani connections, but without tracing them all the way to their source. UK's 'serious' terror threat linked to Pak
Kurt Nimmo has been doing excellent work on this story (and others), and a series of excerpts from his most recent post on the subject will help you to understand where all this terror is coming from: Daunting indeed. You may notice that some of the most damning indictments of the British intelligence services have come from the French. This may be partially due to political correctness, but as Webster Tarpley has pointed out: NATO intelligence is essentially the British and the US acting together [...] De Gaulle kicked NATO out of France in 1966, and the French have been relatively free [...] of the kind of terrorism that you have in Germany and Italy…and Greece where the NATO infrastructure was very strong. So what he was suggesting was that if you kick out NATO, you won’t have a terrorist problem. Meaning, terrorism comes from NATO intelligence...Have a nice weekend. Boo! === Please don't read my blog.
|
![]() |
Your donations help us to keep Start The Revolution alive | ![]() |
|
|