| Help Us To Spread The Word...Click On One Of The Following Links, Sign Up With The Site You Visit If You Have To And Post A Link To This Story...Thanks! |
![]() |
|
The OPR, for those at home, is the Office of Professional Responsibility and I got the following from their website:
So, it transpires that this department was set up to ensure that justice is done by those who claim to seek and protect it. However, due to an executive order signed by Dubya himself, they cannot investigate the conduct of those counselling and aiding the President's action of illegal wiretapping. Surely then the whole point of the department is lost. In addition, the Attorney General, who Dubya picked himself, is being "involved" in a review of the policy every 45 days. Hey, call me crazy, but I am fairly certain that the Office of Professional Responsibility should be the ones "involved" whilst a partisan Attorney General should solely be reported to after its investigations were completed? Finally, Dubya claims that it is important to "keep the number of people exposed to it tight". Does this not indicate that he either believed that the OPR were going to tell him that what he was doing was illegal and unconstitutional or do you think it is because he does not trust them to keep a secret?!??! He is either afraid of the law or he is paranoid...Or maybe he is a little of both. Either way, it is not good that a man who is clearly suffering from mental issues is running the White House and "policing the world". It is time for a change America...Stand up and be counted. Make them realise that you will not give up the independence, liberty and freedom that your ancestors fought and died to give you. Need motivating? Then read Patrick Henry's speech again. There, that should cover it! UPDATE TO THIS ARTICLE INCLUDING VIDEO CLIP HERE! |
Wednesday 19th July 2006 | AFP
US President George W. Bush blocked a Justice Department probe into a secret program to tap international phone calls and electronic communications of US citizens, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said.
Testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Gonzales confirmed that Bush put a halt to an enquiry by department lawyers into the National Security Agency (NSA) program, which involved wiretaps without court warrants.
Meanwhile, two US lawmakers challenged the Justice Department on Tuesday to explain what rights the administration had in tapping phones and allegedly leaking information about sensitive investigations to the media.
The department's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) was to look into the department's role in the NSA program and the legality of its warrantless eavesdropping.
The electronic surveillance program sparked a firestorm after its existence was first disclosed in December by the New York Times.
In a letter to Gonzales made public Tuesday, Democratic Senator Charles Schumer and Representative William Delahunt pointed to alleged security leaks in the Bush administration.
The letter focused attention on US intelligence efforts and public accountability. Administration officials defended their effort, but the opposition lawmakers questioned one of the most delicate issues now facing the Bush administration.
They particularly pointed to The Washington Times, the conservative US capital daily, as reporting news "that appear to have been classified at the time of disclosure."
The letter asked the Bush administration to explain how such information could be published in newspapers when the country was engaged in a "war on terror."
"We are writing to seek clarification of administration policy regarding classification of national security information, as well as the role of the Department of Justice in investigating possible leaks of such information," the letter stated.
"How many referrals to the Department of Justice of suspended leaks of information have been made in the last five years?" the letter asked.
"What, if any action, has been taken on such referrals."
At the White House, presidential spokesman Tony Snow defended Bush's action as necessary to limit the number of people with access to highly classified information.
"What (Bush) was saying is that in a case of a highly classified program, you need to keep the number of people exposed to it tight, for reasons of national security, and that's what he did," Snow told reporters.
The OPR "was not the appropriate venue" for an enquiry, Snow said. "There was already an appropriate venue for doing this...specified by executive order."
Snow said a legal review of the NSA program is already undertaken every 45 days with the involvement of the attorney general.
Civil rights advocates argue that without court oversight the plan could be abused and trample personal privacy rights.