| Help Us To Spread The Word...Click On One Of The Following Links, Sign Up With The Site You Visit If You Have To And Post A Link To This Story...Thanks! |
![]() |
|
It transpires that the exam board assessors marking the exam papers are less intelligent than the pupils are! Ok, that may not be exactly the case, but this is clearly a case of the system failing the pupils and not the pupils failing the exams. When an A* pupil gets marked down because her correct answer does not fit into one of the tick boxes on the assessment scheme paperwork then the system must be deemed a failure and a return to some traditional values must take place. People who understand the subject matter well enough to be able to use their own judgment in a situation like this would be a good start. If the assessor cannot be trusted to use common sense when marking then why not simply make all examinations multiple choice and put the answers into a computer?!??! Our children are having a hard enough time as it is without this kind of foolish behaviour. I do not blame the assessor; I blame the education system. The system no longer tests the ability to learn a subject well enough to use it either personally or professionally to a decent standard but test the ability to learn how to pass exams. This outcome-based rather than goal-based approach is keeping the less bright children down and dragging the brighter ones down too. The government’s education reforms have failed as have the reforms made by previous governments and it is surely time to return to the systems that not only worked but also placed Britain at the forefront of world knowledge and achievement. Imagine the Theory of Relativity being marked down because the answer was not already on the paper?!??! I will finish up with a few quotes from a recent article in the Daily Mail: "Literary giants such as Jane Austen and William Wordsworth are being stripped from English classes along with key facts in maths and science." - Those "old school" writers are just too hard to understand when "great" is now spelt "gr8" and "you are" is spelt "ur"! "In history pupils will be encouraged to learn about the British Empire...But world history is being squeezed out." - Perfect preparation for globalisation and the one world government as that is what will look normal to the pupils learning history this way. "The reforms are designed to give teachers more time providing "catch-up classes" for pupils still lacking basic skills." - Therefore the brighter pupils now get to spend less time in lessons actually learning things so that they can become as average as the less bright pupils will be when they have finished getting extra time in the classroom. And a brief rundown of the changes in various subjects goes a little something like this: English: Maths: Science: On a positive note a consultation is being launched on this early 2007 and the changes will not be implemented until September 2008. This gives us all a lot of time to talk to our local PTA, head teachers (if there are any left) and MP's to make sure that these ridiculous ideas are consigned to the scrapheap before our children's education is further destroyed...Maybe beyond repair this time. But before I finish I absolutely must quote the pupil herself after she learnt of her lost mark... "This one incident, I believe, indicates a wider problem. I feel the entire exam structure is geared towards the standardisation of each pupil regardless of individual talent and ability and find this most discouraging." We can only hope that, when the time comes, she is willing to run the education system for us! |
Tuesday 4th July 2006 | BBC
An "excellent" GCSE student had a mark taken away for giving an answer which a teacher said was "too sophisticated".
Katie Merchant, 16, of Brighton College, missed a "key word" in a Latin mock exam, although she showed more than enough knowledge for a full mark.
Headmaster Richard Cairns said the OCR exam board's assessment scheme, which the school used, was "too mechanistic".
An OCR spokeswoman denied bright pupils were held back and said the system was intended to be fair to all.
'Frustrated'
Mr Cairns said marking schemes - which tells an examiner how many marks to allocate for the various elements of an answer - "frustrated" bright pupils.
He is reducing the maximum number of GCSEs a pupil at the independent school can sit from 11 to nine, to free up more time for "critical thinking".
Mr Cairns said: "The teacher had to take a mark away from Katie even though her answer was excellent.
"We have to follow the exam board's guidelines but it's all so mechanistic."
Katie was still awarded a top A* grade, but Mr Cairns said: "There's no room for individuality. It's like encouraging children to dig up roads when they could be designing bridges."
An OCR spokeswoman said that, as the board had not looked at the school's marking of Katie's paper, she could not comment on the particular case.
She added: "OCR's mark schemes are there to ensure that all candidates receive a fair mark for their work.
"Candidates will always receive credit for answering a question well and our mark schemes do not hold back brighter students."